хранение паролей в SQL Server

The usual way to store password, is to use a hash function on the password, but to salt it beforehand. It is important to "salt" the password, to defend oneself against rainbow table attacks.

So your table should look something like that

._______._________________.______________.
|user_id|hash             |salt          |
|-------|-----------------|--------------|
|12     |adsgasdg@g4wea...|13%!#tQ!#3t...|
|       |...              |...           |

When checking if a given password matches a user, you should concatenate the salt to the given password, and calculate the hash function of the result string. If the hash function output matches the hash column - it is the correct password.

It is important to understand however that the salt-hash idea has a specific reason -- to prevent anyone with access to the database from knowing anyone password (it is considered difficult problem to reverse a hash function output). So for example, the DBA of the bank, wouldn't be able to log-in to your bank account, even if he has access to all columns.

You should also consider using it if you think your users will use a sensitive password (for example their password for their gmail account) as a password to your website.

IMHO it is not always a security feature which is needed. So you should think whether or not you want it.

See this article for a good summary of this mechanism.

Update: It is worth mentioning, that for extra security against targeted attack for reversing individual password's hash, you should use bcrypt, which can be arbitrarily hard to compute. (But unless you're really afraid from mysterious man in black targeting your specific database, I think sha1 is good enough. I wouldn't introduce another dependency for my project for this extra security. That said, there's no reason not to use sha1 100 times, which would give a similar effect).

Encryption for sensitive data is good. However, with passwords, you should never need to know the original value, and since anything which is encrypted can also be decrypted, you put that information at jeopardy of being discovered.

Instead, you should keep a hash of the password. This process takes the value and generates what amounts to a very complicated checksum. Given the number, there's no way to go back to the original password, which increases the security of such information. When you want to know whether someone has given you the correct password, you hash the value they gave you and compare the hashes.

Security is a complicated topic. Even with hashes, you can end up having a system that has significant security flaws. Getting the help of a security consultant is not a bad idea if nobody else on your team already has that kind of knowledge.

T-Sql включает в себя функции шифрования - у 4Guys была хорошая статья об этом для SQL Server 2005 некоторое время назад, но я думаю, что все это применимо и к 2008 году.

обычно это способ сделать.

Ваше приложение будет обрабатывать шифрование (и, возможно, дешифрование), база данных просто сохранит пароль.

Я рекомендую использовать что-то более надежное, чем устаревший defacto - MD5

Большинство разработчиков .NET, похоже, любят использовать TDES