Поиск и устранение неисправностей справки SqlException: Тайм-аут истек на соединении в ситуации незагрузки

Это будет также работать:

std::ostream& operator<< (std::ostream& o, unsigned char c)
{
    return o<<(int)c;
}

int main()
{
    unsigned char a = 06;
    unsigned char b = 0xff;
    std::cout << "a is " << std::hex << a <<"; b is " << std::hex << b << std::endl;
    return 0;
}
31
задан Community 23 May 2017 в 12:18
поделиться

3 ответа

Not Enough Memory

This is very likely a Memory problem, perhaps aggravated or triggered by other things, but still inherently a memory problem. there are two other (less likely) possibilities, that you should check and eliminate first (because it is easy to do so):

Easy To Check Possibilities:

  1. You may have "Auto Close" enabled: Auto Close can have exactly this behavior, however it is rare for it to be turned on. To check this, in SSMS right-click on your application database, select "Properties", and then select the "Options" pane. Look at the "Auto Close" entry and make sure that it is set to False. Check tempdb also.

  2. SQL Agent Jobs may be causing it: Check the Agent's History Log to see if there were any jobs consistently running during the events. Remember to check maintenance jobs too, as things like Rebuilding Indexes are frequently cited as performance problems while they are running. These are unlikely candidates now, only because they would not normally be affected by the Profiler.

Why It Looks Like a Memory Problem:

If those do not show anything, then you should check for memory problems. I suspect Memory as the cause in your case because:

  • You have 1 GB of Memory: Although this is technically above the Minimum for SQL Server, it is way below the recommended for SQL Server, and way below what in my experience is acceptable for production, even for a lightly loaded server.

  • You are running IIS and SQL Server on the same box: This is not recommended by itself, in large part because of the contention for memory that results, but with only 1 GB of memory it results in IIS, the app, SQL Server, the OS and any other tasks and/or maintenance all fighting for very little memory. The way the Windows manages this is to give memory to the active processes by aggressively taking it away from the non-active processes. It can take many seconds, or even minutes for a large process like SQL Server to get back enough of its memory to be able to completely service a request in this situation.

  • Profiler made 90% of the problem go away: This is a big clue that memory is likely the problem, because typically, things like Profiler have exactly this effect on this particular problem: the Profiler task keeps the SQL Server just a little bit active all of the time. Frequently, this is just enough activity to either keep it off the OS's "scavenger" list, or at least reduces it's impact somewhat.

How to Check For Memory as the Culprit:

  1. Turn Off the Profiler: Its having a Heisenberg effect on the problem, so you have to turn it off or you will not be able to see the problem reliably.

  2. Run a System Monitor (perfmon.exe) from another box, that remotely connects to the perfomrance collection service on the box that your SQL Server and IIS are running on. you can most easily do this by first removing the three default stats (they are local only), and then add in the needed stats (below), but make sure to change the Computer name in the first drop-down to connect to your SQL box.

  3. Send the collected data to a file by creating a "Counter Log" on perfmon. If you are unfamiliar with this, then the easiest thing to do is probably to collect the data to a tab or comma separated file that you can open with Excel to analyze.

  4. Set up your perfmon to collect to a file and add the following counters to it:

    -- Processor\%Processor Time[Total]

    -- PhysicalDisk\% Idle Time[for each disk]

    -- PhysicalDisk\Avg. Disk Queue Length[for each disk]

    -- Memory\Pages/sec

    -- Memory\Page Reads/sec

    -- Memory\Available MBytes

    -- Network Interface\Bytes Total/sec[for each interface in use]

    -- Process\% Processor Time[see below]

    -- Process\Page Faults/sec[see below]

    -- Process\Working Set [see below]

  5. For the Process counters (above) you want to include the sqlserver.exe process, any IIS processes, and any stable application processes. Note that this will ONLY work for "stable" processes. Processes that are continually being re-created as needed, cannot be captured this way because there is no way to specify them before they exist.

  6. Run this collection to a file during the time that the problem most frequently happens. Set the collection interval to something close to 10-15 secs. (this collects a lot of data, but you will need this resolution to pick out the separate events).

  7. After you have one or more incidents, stop the collection and then open your colleced data file with Excel. You will probably have to reformat the timestamp column to be usefully visible and show hours minutes and seconds. Use your IIS log to find the exact time of the incidents, then look at the perfmon data to see what was going on before and after the incident. In particular you want to see if its working set was small before and was large after, with a lot of page faulting in between. That's the clearest sign of this problem.

SOLUTIONS:

Either separate IIS and SQL Server onto two different boxes (preferred) or else add more memory to the box. I would think that 3-4 GB should be a minimum.

What About That Weird EF Stuff?

The problem here is that it is most likely either peripheral or only contributory to your main problem. Remember that Profiler made 90% of your incidents go away, so what remains, may be a different problem, or it may be only the most extreme aggravator of the problem. Because of its behavior I would guess that it is either cycling its cache or there is some other background maintenance of the application server processes.

51
ответ дан 27 November 2019 в 22:21
поделиться

Я бы сравнил временную метку тайм-аута со временем выполнения вашего ночного резервного копирования. Если они совпадают, вы можете сделать свой RSS-канал статическим на это время.

Еще одна вещь, которую можно попробовать (хотя это не совсем ответ), - немедленно запустить sp_who , когда вы получите исключение тайм-аута. Он не поймает все (оскорбительный процесс может быть выполнен к тому времени, когда вы его запустите), но вам может повезти.

Вы также можете запустить SQL Profiler, когда отправитесь домой на ночь, и выполнить действие на следующее утро, если снова увидите ошибку. Только убедитесь, что не запускаете его с самого сервера (я почти уверен, что он напоминает вам об этом при запуске).

РЕДАКТИРОВАТЬ: Адресация вашего обновления.

EF обновляет / создает свой кеш? Это могло бы объяснить обилие запросов одновременно и то, почему ни один из запросов не имел совпадений с базой данных позже.

Кроме того, похоже, у вас есть ошибка heisenbug. Единственное, что я могу придумать, чтобы вы добавили, - это гораздо больше протоколирования (в файл или журнал событий).

1
ответ дан 27 November 2019 в 22:21
поделиться

It smells a cronned thing that runs at the same time. As RBarryYoung says.. some nightly backup or it could be something else Do you have root access to the server? Can you see the crontabs?

Could it be some full text indexing plugin on top of the SQL server that runs its reindexing procedures close to the time you are experiencing the issues?

0
ответ дан 27 November 2019 в 22:21
поделиться
Другие вопросы по тегам:

Похожие вопросы: