Лучший сторонний инструмент синтаксического анализатора резюме [закрывается]

Я видел много резюме в формате PDF. Вы уверены, что не заботитесь о них?

Я рекомендовал бы что-то простое:

1. Загрузите поиск по компьютеру Google или подобный инструмент (т.е. Copernic)
2. Отбросьте файлы в каталоге
3. Укажите на индексный инструмент на тот каталог и перфорацию в Ваших критериях поиска.

Don't try to build one unless you want to dedicate your life to it. Don't re-invent wheels!

We build and sell a recruitment system. I did a long evaluation a few years ago and went for Daxtra - the other one in the frame was Burning Glass but I got the impression that Daxtra did non-US resumes better.

Anyway, we're re-evaluating it. Some parts it does brilliantly (name, address, phone numbers, work history) as long as the resume is culturally OK. But if it's not then it fails. What do I mean: Well, if the resume has as the first line:

Name: Sun Yat Sen

then Daxtra is smart enough to figure out that Sun Yat Sen is the guy's name. (Girl's?)

But if it has as the first line:

Sun Yat Sen

It can't figure it out.

On the other hand if the first line is

Johnny Rotten

then Daxtra works out his name.

Also, it works really well on UK addresses, fairly well on Australian addresses, crashes and burns on Indonesian addresses. That said, we've just parsed 35,000 Indonesian resumes relatively well - CERTAINLY far better than not doing it at all, or doing it manually!

On Skilling: I reckon if someone really tried to make the Skills section work then it would take 3 man-months or so and it would work really well.

Summary: Don't write it yourself, do some really good research on real resumes that you want parsing and dive in.

The key thing is: Don't expect any tool to be anywhere near 100% accurate - but it's a lot better than not having it.

Neil